 |
 |
Brick No139: The man who may make Specsavers rebrand
By Matt Weston, Thursday 7 April 2005
The Man Who
Most Sunday mornings, I spend some time tearing articles
out of the weekend papers.
Quite often I pass Jo a section she's not read that has a
hole running right through it.
As often as not, the articles are for others, not me. I
figure that, if I can connect new ideas and introduce
leads to friends, suppliers and customers I don't only get
the Ready Brek glow; I also generate goodwill a la Brick No108.
Last week, I forwarded Andy Bell a write-up about Harrow
old boy Jamie Murray Wells (21), and his new company
Glasses Direct. (Andy built the Business Bricks website,
if you didn't know.)
I added the piece to my tear-outs because I wear contact
lenses. And Glasses Direct plans to enter that market.
I'll explain why I passed it to Andy in a sec. (He doesn't
wear glasses or contact lenses.)
A pair of £140 specs cost about £7 to produce
The gist of the clipping was this:
Jamie, an old pal of Prince Harry, set up Glasses Direct
from his parents' spare room. He decided to go into the
glasses trade when he discovered he had paid £140 for a
pair of specs that cost about £7 to produce. A 1/20th.
Glasses Direct exploits a legal loophole to undercut
high-street specs retailers. Consumers have the right to
pay £17.50 for an eye test from any optician, who then has to
supply a written prescription. So, if you so choose, you can
get a test from Specsavers or Boots but buy online via
Glasses Direct. Prices start at £15 a pair.
So far, Jamie has over 21,500 paying customers and is
running at around 300 new orders a day.
Specsavers, meanwhile, ape the way the record industry dealt
with music downloads . . . (1) Boss Mary Perkins writes in
her local Guernsey newspaper that Glasses Direct glasses
don't meet required standards. (2) She retreats behind her
press team who say: "We do not believe [Glasses Direct]
threatens us because it is not the same as our business."
The full story.
Andy, meet Jamie
The PR people behind Glasses Direct have more connections
than a Meccano set. Jamie has had full write ups in The
Telegraph and The Times. And if a thread pulls 156 heated
comments on The Daily Hell bulletin board you must be doing
something right.
Apparently, this press attention has pulled 1.5 million
visitors to the Glasses Direct website.
But whereas every column inch has talked up Jamie as the
upstart, a young Che, the people's champion, the man who
might make Specsavers rethink its name; the Glasses Direct
site is a bit, well, corporate.
A far cry from the "revolutionary" message, it just looks
like a site selling cheaper than usual glasses.
Don't you agree? www.glassesdirect.co.uk
IMO, there's a disconnection between the message the press
has picked up on and the message the site gets across.
It's completely understandable. Jamie has gone from
zero sales to hero status in months.
But if he can make that connection!
If he can figure out a way to make the Glasses Direct site
excite in the way the press stories excite, he'll convert far
more browsers to buyers. Which is where Andy Bell comes in.
How to fix Jamie's site
After a couple of speculative emails and phone calls, Andy
has lined up a speculative meeting with Jamie.
To complement Andy's own stack of ideas, I thought I'd help
him on his way by sharing two of mine:
(1) Can The Canned Photos.
The Glasses Direct site, like the Specsavers site
uses canned photos. Not
paying customers but paid models.
Can them.
Instead, get happy customers to send in self-taken photos of
them in their new glasses. If they're blurry, wonky,
amateurish, that's best. Put them on the homepage. (See Joi
Ito's Random Faceroll.)
List as many photos as you can get people to send in,
alongside your testimonials: these shouldn't be from B.D.,
Mrs V. and Revd. M.J. List as many details as the writer will
give you permission to use i.e. full name, occupation, town,
street, frame chosen, saving made. And don't edit: print the
testimonials in full.
People aren't enthused by "As Seen On National TV". They're
enthused when they see that other, real-life people are
buying your specs (and that they're so plussed they send in
snapshots and testimonials).
(2) Fr*e Contact Lenses
According to the Observer, Jamie's next move is to start
supplying contact lenses. He plans to undercut the average
high street price of £24 for 30 pairs by 50%.
Instead: undercut the average high street price by 25%, not
50% (£18 for a monthly supply of 30 pairs, not £12). But,
every time an existing customer introduces a new customer
she gets £2 knocked off her monthly bill. So if she brings
on 9 customers, she gets her lenses free. (After 9, you
start paying her to wear lenses. Really.)
This means that, for every new customer recruited this way,
Jamie pays £2 a month "recruitment cost".
In this case, this is a much better way of recruiting new
customers than any affiliate scheme. (A Java Script tells me
that "the affiliate page is coming soon . . .")
We've come full circle. Tearing out articles to forward to
friends and colleagues is a surprisingly powerful way to
build a network. By the same token, a scheme that helps a
friend save a friend money is far more powerful than a
scheme that helps an affiliate make itself money.
How to get your website critiqued
All this talk of fixing websites reminds me . . .
Last November, and in January, I ran batches of reader
websites for you to critique:
Tim, Sarah, Martin, Jay, and Shirley.
Allena, Ben, Steve, Jason, and Matt.
Jenny, Ken, Gary, Paul, and Julian.
I thought I'd run the same experiment again next week. Only
I guess now, it's not really an experiment. It works.
Ken (from Brick No109) said: "What a brilliant response I've
had from fellow Brickies - so far, 27 replies all offering
good advice about my website. I only got one email from a
company promoting their services without including any
critique. I feel morally obliged to make a donation now, Mr
Weston."
So if you have a new, impending or broken site that you
would like other Bricks readers to review for you, drop as
many details as you can to this address.
Note: I always get far too many critique requests to
feature, so I can't promise you'll be included. But I AM
open to bribes.
Remember to sign up: back to top
|
 |
|
 |
|