 |
 |
Brick No135: Your No1 online competitor
By Matt Weston, Thursday 10 March 2005
Your No1 online competitor
Believe it or not, the second most common thing people
click on the web is the phrase "skip intro".
In other words, fast-forward.
If you insist on blocking the way-in to your website with a
trophy wife Flash Animation, chances are your visitors will
sidestep her advances.
But nobody wants to know about the runner-up, the SECOND
most common thing. Especially when Steve Krug reckons the
MOST common thing accounts for between 30-40% of all web
clicks. (And he's watched and measured a whole lot of
people making a whole lot of clicks.)
In first-place, by no short length, is the back button.
In other words, rewind.
Speaking of which, if you haven't got a website, and will
never ever want one, you might not see much relevance in
today's Brick. Perhaps you're even thinking of rewinding to
what you were doing a minute ago.
So to keep everyone smiling, I've posted some reader
feedback on Brick No133, "Fixing The Film Shop" . . . some
bricks & mortar ideas that should be interesting and
instructive to all small business owners alike. Digital
viewers should press the red button now. Or follow this
link.
For the rest of us, back to the back button . . .
Why we use the Back Button to navigate
Four reasons why the 30-40% stat makes sense:
(1) If a page loads too slowly, the user clicks back.
(2) It's quicker to run forwards than backwards. But, on
the web, the opposite is true. If you click back, pages
load quicker because they're already cached.
(3) Whether you use IE 5/6, Firefox, Safari, Opera or
Navigator, the back button is built into the top-left hand
corner of your browser. And we all know the first place the
eyes go on screen.
(4) Jacob Nielson calls the back button "a standard command
that is always the same". Many links offer an unexpected
result. But the back button takes you back to safe
territory, to what you know.
And one reason why the stat might go higher:
(5) More and more, we're relaying forward and back, forward
and back, from search engine results. It takes Google 0.25
seconds to ping back 156 million results. As Steve Krug
puts it: "There's not much of a penalty for guessing wrong
[. . .] usually only a click or two of the back button."
So we use the back button more because we're impatient, and
because it's quick, top-left, reliable and easy.
Each time someone visits your website, you're competing
with the back button for her attention. (And the search
results or previous page the back button returns her to.)
And here's the scoop: the average website is getting more
visits, but less attention with each visit. If you play
around with Alexa you'll see that many
sites now average less than two clicks a visit.
More and more, you're telling me that the problem isn't
getting traffic to your website, but converting that
traffic to sign-ups or sales.
How to compete
A couple of ideas:
(1) Give An Easy Click.
The easy click on www.businessbricks.co.uk is the
top Brick. The click gives an expected result: More. Hot Or
Not works because people know what
to do right away: Vote. Unless you sell a blindingly easy
click that engages your visitor immediately, chances are
they will click the back button.
(2) Do Less.
Most sites try to do too much. And they try to appeal to
everyone, rather than just the Type A customers. Read this
from Seth G and decide what it
is that you really, really want your visitor to do. And
use landing pages to make sure your visitor only sees
relevant messages.
Bric-A-Brac
More chances to press red.
(1) Further reading. Mark Hurst has a lot of useful stuff
to say on today's subject. MH also
runs www.thisisbroken.com a project that shows up
broken customer experiences. Worth a look.
(2) Further further reading. This time courtesy of Little
Britain extra, Vincent Flanders, "The Biggest Web Design
Mistakes of 2004, Part 2"
(3) New reader meet-ups in Oxford, Guildford, Cardiff and
Brighton. And, to prove we still have a Northern Soul,
happenings next week in Glasgow (Monday 14 March) and
Liverpool (Tuesday 15 March).
(4) 17 Feb. Roy Keane accuses Arsenal players of diving,
joking that the trend for colour-coded wristbands be
extended to one for anti-diving.
Within days, opportunist Tom Lippiett has red "No To Diving"
bands up on eBay at a fiver a pop (50% to Oxfam). He gets
coverage in the Man U fanzines, in the red tops and in the
Daily Telegraph, and sells over a thousand. Oh, and Tom
happens to warm the bench for my Sunday league team.
(5) Once again, the link to some "Fixing The Film Shop"
feedback.
Big thanks go to Gavin, Arbind, Sarah Clarkson, Sarah
Clarke, Rupert (x2), Tim (for the joke), and to everyone
else who filled the suggestion inbox.
Remember to sign up: back to top
|
 |
|
 |
|