 |
 |
Brick No105: A crash course in website usability
By Matt Weston, Friday 22 October 2004
Three ways to use the web
The last thing I want to do is reopen the playground spat of
two months ago
but as I think the hot potato has had enough time to cool,
today I want to talk again about web design. (Yep, in a past
life I manufactured red rags to wave at bulls).
As I see it you have three options:
(a) You use the web to show off.
Do this if you run a design agency that is held completely
unaccountable by its clients. I like the Vincent Flanders translation of web branding: "We're going to spend a lot of
your money putting your name out in front of the public, but
we're going to do it in such a way that you can't prove we
screwed up."
(b) You use the web to cut costs.
Do this if you run a company that can't figure out how to
make money from a prospect calling you up. Bury your
telephone number dozens of clicks down into your site. Make
it as difficult as possible for your prospect to find what
she/ he really wants. (See brick 104).
(c) You use the web to make a sale.
Do this. Ironically this means taking the exact opposite
approach to (b). The way to make a sale is to make it as
easy as possible for your prospect to find what he/ she
wants. The powers that be call this usability, and it's
something that every small business owner using the web to
sell should understand, even if you need a webby to put it
into practice.
A crash course in website usability
Please don't misinterpret me on this. I never said that you
had to learn Cascading Style Sheets and JavaScript yourself
to come up with a website that works.
But I did implore you to take responsibility for your
website making money, and work with your (very talented) web
design team to achieve that. Even if your idea of techy is
setting the video, your job is to bone-up not on the HTML,
but on the HTMMSS . . . How To Make My Site Sell.
And that means taking a crash course in the basics of
usability:
(1) "Learn Good Design By Looking At Bad Design" (Vincent
Flanders). websitesthatsuck.com tells you how not
to do it . . . "there are no real rules except make the
sale". Flanders motto is that if Amazon doesn't do it, it
probably doesn't work - it has invested more money in
testing usability than anyone else.
(2) "Less Is More". Right now, I'd argue that Google is the
most useable site on the planet. It has a single, clear
objective (Search Me!) that results in a "sale" via its
advertising revenue
(3) "Don't Make Me Think". That's the title of Steve Krug's very readable book. The less your prospect has to think, the
better. Clear navigation should make it easy to figure out
where you are, and where you want to go. Spend an hour today
reading the interviews on his site then buy the book
(4) "Revenues on the web are determined almost completely by
usability" (Jakob Nielson in The Economist, 2001). The
heavyweight of usability, Nielson has lost his way recently.
Sure, usability is a science, but that doesn't mean sites
like this sell. That said I
receive (and enjoy) his fortnightly "Alertbox" newsletter.
(5) "Where's the banana?" Seth Godin's e-book, "The Big Red
Fez" was the No1 bestseller on Amazon for months and months
. . . but now oddly is only available in paperback. The
premise is simple: think of every visitor as a monkey.
Where's the banana? If it's not easy to see, the monkey is
gone. Good intro to usability.
(6) "What We Saw When We Looked Through Their Eyes". Visit
this site if you want to get reeeaally
scientific research of how visitors actually read websites
. . . all based on eyeball movement. Less scientific, but
equally useful is webdesignpractices.com
(7) "The most common mistake in web design is not testing"
(Steve Krug, again) . . . "People launch sites all the time
with major flaws that would have been fixed earlier if
they'd only done a few user tests early on." The last third
of "Don't Make Me Think" is given over to low-budget
usability testing.
How to get a web critique
The last point is the most important.
I receive several emails every week from readers asking me
to critique new, impending or broken sites. By broken, I
mean "doesn't sell".
My problem is that as this list gets bigger and bigger
(we're now at 8,500 readers) it becomes more and more
difficult to find time to answer every single such request.
As it happens, I've come up with a better solution. From
today, if you have a new, impending or broken site on
which you want feedback . . . then drop a line to this address (tell us what
you're trying to achieve/ when the site will go live etc).
Then, every so often in the Bric-A-Brac, I'll feature a
selection of said sites (at my discretion), and ask our very
generous community of small business owners to give you
their feedback.
There's no cost to this service although I am of course open
to bribes. (See businessbricks.co.uk/donate.htm)
Bric-A-Brac
A very quick thank you to long-time reader (and donor)
Andy Bell. Inadvertently, Andy provided the inspiration for
today's brick by choosing the best slogan possible for his
new web design firm, Mint Digital. The slogan? Simply this:"Websites that sell".
Remember to sign up: back to top
|
 |
|
 |
|